I think his son was more dangerous than the crown prince Surendra and I think maybe that's because of his father's condition but partly because of the insecure upbringing that the young mother had a young mother and her culture was trying to get rid of of of her.
Because of her younger brother her older son that would make you less confident if you feel people are trying to kill you a war between young queen Lakshmi Devi and crown prince Surendra would lead to the first massacre of Nepal's royal assassination.
The young queen of King Rajendra wanted to put her son on top of the throne of Nepal in opposition to the claim of the young son king.
So in this case, the queen took the help of one powerful court
whose name was found by Singh but unfortunately, the emperor was suddenly killed and when emperor Singh was assassinated.
All the leading chiefs meet to find the killer of his favorite court, Gagan Singh, instead of finding a murderer in the middle of the court.
Bahadur and his brother only survived and that is why Rana's reign began in Nepal's history in the tragedy that followed the assassination of khat zhang bahadur saw his opportunity to take control.
He encouraged the overthrow of the army and removed the king and sent Rajendra and Lakshmi Devi into exile and installed Surendra on the throne — as a family he abducted before him the bahadur and kept the young king confined to the house permanently and under his control, making himself the eternal prime minister.
Learning from the mistakes of the shahs he established a succession line so that his family inherited his office taking over Rana's genealogy and thus began the century of Rana's reign in a succession of animated kings so how could shah's house rise again to rule Nepal.
The royal family of Nepal is familiar with the bloodshed and conspiracy in 1846 and the power struggle that followed in court.
It was to shake the royal family of the shah and oust it from power for more than a century after decades of court politics and unstable rulers.
Runners the ruthless genealogy of the dying prime minister emerges from the shadow of Nepalese nobles she has to live under a visible house.
They tied the heads of their palaces the symbolic empire led to a false power over the robbers of Rana but in practical terms, good people who are powerless say shah the monarchy ruled but did not rule over.
The Granites who ruled the land as the kings act as the official of their government the arena retains its grip on power by ensuring that it does not enter the same trap with shahs.
They set straight rules and order Rana adopted a line of order that was not subject to the principles of ancient nature.
When the prime minister of Rana died was followed by the youngest member of the family and in that system, there was no question about the prime minister.
The next prime minister of Arana was all 40 or 50 years old which is why he was not the youngest prime minister who learned from the mistakes of the monarchy but also learned from the Nepalese vision founder.
I think when they were alone the Aranas were playing Priti vinal in the shah's the idea of a pure state that closes your boundaries is convincing.
That no harm can come to your enemies who cannot enter retaining the view of Nepal as an independent country with its own unique identity.
It was this desire to preserve the sanctity of their borders that led them to seek a partner in the region if there was one thing the runners realized was the power and importance of the British Empire around the world and especially at their doorstep.
Their main neighbor in southern India was under British rule and the allies who had been active in love with the British throughout their empire.
Describe the centenary of Rana's reign in Nepal and the loss of which was a sign of the end of their power in 1947 a political earthquake shook.
The Rana dynasty on its foundations Lord Mountbatten bids farewell to the first British troops the revered Indian god is honored by the men of their march signaling.
At the end of British rule about one night, the British disappear into India and with them, Arana's support of Iranian prime ministers loses surveillance of the British government.
This is very important so the new Indian government was not in favor of continuing the Rama dictatorship instead, they wanted some kind of democratic government in Nepal, the money was very close to the British to be liked.
Newly independent India and its prime minister Nehru wanted their closest neighbor to be ruled by an impeccable person alliance with British Nehru demanded a democratic government.
Nepal was right but he did not want a fully democratic government in Nepal. The Rana regime must be abolished but the new state must be under the leadership of the king and not under the leadership of the people.
That is why Ranjit Nehru has played a major role in the late 1950s and all negotiations in Delhi took place under his direction.
The kingdom of Rana was under pressure from outside its borders at the same time the pressure was mounting within the country to change.
The Indian nationalist organization, the Indian congressional movement that had led to its acquisition of independence in India had a profound effect on the small number of upper-class.
Nepali people receive their education in India. Indian cities in the 30s and 40s and to some extent, by imitating the Indians the nationalist army formed its own political parties.
Then small but ready to take one of the times of the Indian political struggle and use it in their context Nepal needed a new governor and a new government.
All eyes turned to shahs tribune had been on the throne since 1911 but like his ancestors, before him, the whole of his life was controlled by successive runners first, Judah Shanshan Rana, and in 1945.
Mourinho Rana was too weak to take power but the leaders of the new democratic parties could not once be gone the runners had become too open to that kind of opposition and an armed insurgency.
Took place for some time in 1949 1950 and they were able to cooperate with the king and show him that they would restore him to the emperor. , if he helps them in their affairs.
He struggled and gave them some assurances about the introduction of democracy and so on after he was reinstated as opposition parties rallied for Prime Minister Mahan Shan to tighten his grip on power.
If the court comes out under the Rana regime he will have to leave Nepal the king's movement was so controlled that in 1950.
As a result of a hunting expedition with his team and most of the king of his family was dragged away from his palace but instead of taking the route, he was expected to take suddenly no one. the road.
At the Indian embassy where he applied for some form of political asylum and was deported to New Delhi for the entire royal family.
In exile except for the three-year-old grandson of king Gyanendra in the last attempt to save the Rana empire the prime minister made him king hoping to rule another puppet king but to no avail, the people of Nepal looked on.
A king who is not like the savior of their savior to India who could not be seen as just a desire to save his life was wisely handled to look like a step to save his people and in 1951 the tribal king returned to Kathmandu a national hero.
Tribunal is important in its image there was a king who was willing to give his throne for the sake of the people for democracy.
So the mark of king 31 who leaves his palace to take refuge begging and finally Deli symbolizes a king who is willing to leave his own throne for the sake of the people so what that image does is inclusive.
The people's leaders and the monarchy jointly contributed to the overthrow of the monarchy so that a three-pronged action was essential to the restoration of the monarchy in Nepal.
As he secured his throne, honored his agreement with Democratic leaders, and opened the door to change he was recognized as the father of democracy.
In Nepal by all, and even today he has not attacked troops in the Republic did not attack the image that follows centuries after full rule began with the shah, and then the Arana's transition to a fledgling democracy would be difficult.
The democracy that was established in 1950 was very weak there was a great deal of political instability and this continued again and again. since 1955.
When he died and his son became king Mahindra
Mahendra ascended the throne in 1955 at that time Nepal's new democratic system was in turmoil and there was deep tension.
The people saw this as an opportunity to establish his authority in the nation and lead his country forward in a new world.
Age he was an ambitious man he grew up in a very traditional place he did not get western education he got it all
education within the palace buildings but.
He was a traditional Hindu king who saw his role as protector of the state as an aide Mahendra moved to restore the traditional power of the king.
While at the same time opening the door to modern influences
when assuming government responsibility, he tried to be a very kind dictator.
If he will admit that it is because of him that the modern system began in Nepal enacted laws that led to the formation of the earth and laid roofs over large areas and also imposed certain restrictive legislatures.
A framework of frames so he tried to finish what he was thinking some of the more reclining habits and in so doing tried to make the world a more modern one Mahendra was running.
The political race and trying to be both a far-sighted modern and benevolent dictator and it was this conflict he brought to the Nepalese throne.
That would lead to the final collapse of the shah house in one terrible night that could not be imagined in many Nepali languages and ethnicities.
Presented a rich painting to the foreign world but the biggest problem for its political rulers Mahendra struggled with the double role of a kind and modern dictatorship saw his role as king of Nepal.
In order to provide strong leadership and stability in his country, he was a patriotic figure in the structures and he believed.
That political parties were not in a position to lead the country towards stability or modern development or progress and although.
He believed he allowed parties to continue. another five years when in 1960 he declared that he could no longer rule the country by factions and announced a non-partisan system Mahendra introduced a panchayat system of governance where he was the sole overseer of the local administrative network.
In 1979 during a student uprising on Kathmandu streets, he announced that there would be a national referendum on the country's political system and the country would be asked.
If it wanted to continue the so-called panchayat program.
The country wanted to move from that to multi-party democracy and the country was asked this question so people say Virendra knows you have given us a choice.
When I think you have gained fame by deliberately at least opening it up for national discussion people voted less to maintain the panchayat system despite this the state of change continued until the early 1990s again it exploded in the streets.
In this case, there were deadly consequences seeing his citizens being shot forced Birendra's hand and he finally agreed to step down.
A perfect emperor and a constitutional king this amazing move may have brought peace to the country but it caused great divisions in the royal family.
Itself in general, it is said that King Birendra was the only member of the royal family for his democratic ideas and often said that his stepmother Ratna was the most beautiful
very eager to continue.
The program was started by her husband king Mahendra similarly to queen Aishwarya Birendra's wife and he was eager to use his power as his queen.
My brother Ravindra also did not like to empower people once again the shah king found himself surrounded by rival teams
it does not look like a healthy family.
If one looks at it you know the events of the last 10 years however it is difficult to guess the relationship between the family but one idea is that this is not very interrelated.
The small unit always felt that inside the palace there was this group constantly trying to overthrow any form of democracy despite the opposition of his family Birendra gave power to the elected government.
But the problems of Nepal did not end when his new government was overthrown fighting unemployment that opens the door to a new movement to change the Communists after 1990 the failure of the elected government to maintain or mean to govern the country satisfactorily.
This led to the growth of the Maoists in the Communist party but over time, it received violent news in many parts of the country in 1996 the Maoists declared war on the people and launched an offensive campaign.
It could cost the lives of fourteen thousand people back in the palace, the royal family is divided over how to respond to the rebellion others push a strong military option but Birendra increasingly divided choosing.
The soft way is one of the things to note I think. irrelevant that the Nepalese royal army was not deployed against the Maoist rebels until the revolt of Mao.
Had occupied the largest part of the country and that is said to have been because Birendra was unwilling to use the army that way because he did not want his Nepalese army to shoot at Nepali civilians but some kind of black learning.
That means the monarchy wanted the growth of the Maoist empire. They were out of control because they saw it as a way to eliminate political parties and undermine them.
The democracy they had never loved so much in the first place cash house has never been far from the rumors and tricks their history is full of plains with conspiracy.
Theory tales of backstage deals and power brokering but now the divisions within the royal family would literally separate them I was at the Moscow airport.
When I heard about the tragedy and when I first heard about it I said I would not believe it. I remember being called by my relatives that.
You heard you heard you know gunshots and the palace was scary you know because one would not expect such a horrible act to be ineffective the phone rang and a friend from Nepal said my lord is bad for me.
I can't believe it and what I said and he said the whole royal family was killed on June 1, 2001, the royal family reunited as they used to do on Friday night family night Prince Virendra came out of the lounge where the family lived.
They chatted and headed for his house when he arrived armed with an m16 rifle and an mp5k machine pistol and returned to the sitting room.
He started shooting and killing half of his family in the same room his mother and brother fled the palace chased him and shot him dead in the end, he shot his gun on him one more time, and even now.
I wake up saying he knows. that was especially true felt the prince at that time was a very wise man very well
would such a wise man do such a horrible thing that sometimes?
It still strikes me no one knows why the dependent killed his family and as there are widespread ideas of a conspiracy in the history of the Nepalese dynasty.
Some say Jitendra wanted to overthrow his father and put himself in demand. Returned to full rule some say he was killed by his uncle the king's younger brother.
They also wanted to be king and others say he was angry because his parents did not allow him to marry the woman he loved Rani a member of the famous Rana dynasty old shah enemies hardly in the history of our legends in Hindu myths.
You know it is common for kings to kill other kings but my father was killed by the sun the fat meant and the registry that occurs and the matric unfamiliar and which has never been in the history of anyone.
Even Greek mythology or Hindu mythology conquers this so it was a complete shock that the shah empire was steeped in mythology from its inception.
On the subject of the curse imposed by its founder Prithvi Narayan shah and it seemed that the curse had been fulfilled.
Birendra.
The tenth generation of shah kings had died and it was thought that the 11th king would be the mediator of the final collapse of the shah house on 4 June 2001 Miranda's brother Gyanendra was anointed, king.
The second he was crowned three years old during the deportation of king's trip van to India and almost 50 years later he took over the monarchy and his second reign would be unpopular as the first he always had political ambitions about it.
While this comes from the other side he saw this as an opportunity but we should also understand it as an individual and as a family member.
He had lost everything around him and that had a really bad effect on him who was unpopular and faced Maoist change was the worst situation for an elderly businessman to start a new job.
However, he had plans to make the king's mark Chandra have strong opinions that he believed the king should use his real power.
but when he became king his actions showed that yes, he wanted to use the power of the king in the full sense of torture any hopes.
That Nagendra might pursue his brother’s freedom policies and low keys soon vanished he tried to oppress the Maoists and political parties at the same time 2005 time just as his father Mahindra did in 1960 Gyanendra dismissed parliament and took over.
Control as the king's press freedom was curtailed and political activists were imprisoned Nagendra thought he was restoring peace.
Stability but it looked like a dictatorship and it would be the last nail in the coffin of the shah dynasty trying these two political forces and placing his one role in the country.
I think that eventually led to the collapse of the monarchy in the country. People were outraged by Sandra's action again
Violence erupts in Nepal.
A ruler in Nepali history, if he had pursued a revolutionary agenda but instead of getting involved in a political game that he knew led to him becoming aware of some kind of collapse despite the expulsion of many monarchs from Nepal.
I still love the shahs and ask for their return but if you have to believe the Prithvi Narayan shah curse this is the last act of this royal game, Nagendra was really.
The 11th king of Nepal would really preside over the catastrophic fall in power bloody and bizarre as the mythical curse promised maybe just a myth but throughout its history, there seems to have been a shadow over.
The house of the war-born shahs who lived in harmony with their future against an ever-changing bloody world. conflicts and political intrigue before death by confusion and panic are probably just the story of life curses in a series of repeated historical events.
Itself the shah story should end here but maybe the cycle has one more the stock exchange has already made one return to victory in secret when tripe van faced the prime minister of Rana in 1950 can she has risen again to take their place as the kings of Nepal.
No comments:
Post a Comment